THE GIRL on the TRAIN
by Paula Hawkins
I'm very excited to offer the review of this month's book. But first, thanks to Janie for hosting. Unfortunately, we were missing Darby, who was ill. Laura's daughter, Megan, had read the book and joined us for the discussion, There was definitely an exuberant mood as we arrived and prepared for dinner. Janie had asked that we do a supper of light salads, appetizers, bread, cheese and dessert. As, you can see from the photos, that is just what we did. Our conversation continued throughout dinner and moved with us into the living room. It took us several minutes to settle down for the book discussion.
April's book is considered a psychological thriller often compared to Hitchcock. In retrospect, I can't believe I didn't think to compare it to "Rear Window"! One of the aspects of the PT is that it emphasizes the characters unstable mental state and a dissolving sense of reality. Told from the first person narrative of three different women, Rachel's voice stands out as the main narrator.
Rachel Watson - ex-wife of Tom
Anna Watson - current wife of Tom and mother to Evie
Megan Hempwill - wife of Scott, neighbor of Tom and occasional babysitter to Evie
When you put it like that, the common denominator is easy to spot. But, we only gradually see these connections as the story unfolds. Rachel is bereft at being unable to conceive a child with Tom. This sends her down a spiral of self-destructive alcoholism. Tom has an affair with Anna that finally ends the marriage. Anna is pregnant with Evie when she moves in with Tom into the home he had shared with Rachel. Meagan attempts to babysit Evie. Simultaneously, Rachel takes up a room in a friend's flat and takes a job in London. Rachel's life is further "derailed" when she is fired due to drinking on the job. She omits telling her roommate opting instead to board the train every day to London as if she's still working.
Now, Rachel didn't have to go to London every day to keep up the pretense of working. But, she chooses a path that takes her past her old home that is visible from the train if the circumstances are just right. In order to keep from focusing too much on her old life and her husband's new one, Rachel "obsesses" on the new couple four doors down. They've moved in after she left and, not knowing them, she creates a story and gives them names. She idealizes them as the perfect couple until one day she sees the woman (Jess) kissing a man who is not her husband (Jason). The next day, Jess, whose name turns out to be Megan, turns up missing. Rachel is certain the man she was kissing had something to do with the disappearance and attempts to tell the police and then, Jason whose name turns out to be Scott.
Rachel's alcoholism makes her not only an "unreliable witness" in the story but, an "unreliable narrator"; Laura's favorite topic! I did a little research and offer a few thoughts here. "The unreliable narrator is one of the trickiest literary topics to get right. Get it wrong, and the story is simply too frustrating or falls apart. Get it right, the pages can't turn fast enough." It's important for the reader to ask, "who is talking and what are they trying to hide?"
The characters have a general struggle to grasp reality and suffer moral ambiguity. The relationships are complex and tortured. Fear and anxiety drive the psychological tension. The author hits all the buttons for this type of thriller.
Pam and Lis found the characters unlikable, static, weak. and without redeeming qualities. Others sympathized with the women's pain as they learned more about their histories. Some weren't sure that the internal dialog concerning Rachel's struggle with alcoholism felt real, others thought it spot on. There was a lively discussion about whether or not Rachel had any awareness or change in her circumstances at the end of the book. I felt that she was on the road to recovery. She wasn't going to put down the bottle and become recovered overnight. But, the awareness that Tom was not the man she thought him to be and that she had been "gaslighted" throughout the marriage, gave her back a sense of reality. Lou astutely pointed out that Rachel could not have had any hope of redemption without the circumstances that unfolded.
The train is another character in the book. It is used as a means of transportation and also a metaphor for Rachel's life. Trains can evoke thoughts of a journey, romance and, freedom. But, Rachel is on a commuter train, making scheduled and predictable stops. She is making a circular journey every day and one that is taking her to the heart of the pain that she tries so desperately to deaden with alcohol. Her life has derailed in every way and she is hitting bottom. The train also offers the opportunity for the voyeurism that is required to drive this story. And on this train she is surrounded by people but all alone in her anguish. And, the lives of the people that come together at this intersection are headed for a train wreck. The disappearance of Megan gives Rachel a sense of purpose that has been missing in her life.
One of the things that I really enjoyed about this book is that it followed a formula that I enjoy and have been missing. In recent years, I have noticed that authors have veered away from plots that build with tension, hit a climax, and then wind up the loose ends. Many novels have characters or objects that seem critical to the story but evaporate into thin air. There is no climax to the story and the endings are anti-climatic and disappointing. This story's tension built, there were sufficient plot twists and turns and a dramatic climax. Though, we'd all guessed the culprit before the end, the author still did a good job of keeping us hanging in to see how it would resolve.
The book rated a 3.6. Darby gave it a 3.5 but said it made her feel like a voyeur while reading it. But, aren't we all voyeur's when we're peering into the lives of characters we're observing in our novels?
Our next book is The Stolen Child.


















